Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 00022 2
Original file (BC 2010 00022 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00022-2
	XXXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Purple Heart.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 15 September 2010, the Board considered and denied a similar 
appeal.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the 
earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at 
Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through D).

Via DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, 
dated 15 January 2014, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration.  He agrees that there is no medical record which 
substantiates that he was treated for his foot injury because 
there were several casualties that occurred prior to his injury.  
Therefore, while his foot injury would not have been a priority, 
it should not diminish the validity of his request. 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of an electronic communiqué and photographs. 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence 
provided in support of his appeal, it remains the opinion of the 
Board that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof 
or that he has been the victim of an error or injustice.  The 
Board has carefully considered the statements and photographs 
provided by the applicant and while the Board believes the 
evidence to be new and relevant, it is not of such significance as 
to alter the original decision.  As previously noted, the 
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show his alleged 
injury was a result of direct enemy action.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no basis to 
recommend favorable consideration of his application.


 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 12 February 2015, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2010-
00022-2 was considered:

    Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 8 October 2010,
                w/Exhibits.
    Exhibit F.  DD Form 149, dated 15 January 2014, w/atchs.


 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00022

    Original file (BC-2010-00022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation from the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s record, no medical documentation was located or provided that verifies him being treated for injuries received on 2 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00022

    Original file (BC-2011-00022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He feels he should have been referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) prior to his non-selection for reenlistment. A complete copy of the DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibits D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. We note the applicant’s contention that he should have been considered by an MEB for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00611

    Original file (BC-2010-00611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received shrapnel in his right hand, frostbite to three toes on his left foot and wounds and injuries from an incoming explosion (back, knee, and right shoulder). When making combat-related determinations the Board looks for documentation from the time of the injury confirming the event and the injury. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00814

    Original file (BC 2009 00814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00814 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions of Flat Foot (scar from Morton’s Disease removal) and Disfigurement of Head, Neck or Face (scalp scar), be found to be combat related and he receive beneftis under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00022

    Original file (BC-2005-00022.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. Received an Article 15 on 4 Apr 68 for failure to repair. The commander recommended the applicant receive an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04050

    Original file (BC-2010-04050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Jul 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal, the American Campaign Medal (ACM), and the World War II Victor Medal (WWIIVM) and corrected his records administratively. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02709

    Original file (BC 2010 02709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The deceased member’s widow provides her account of the mission that resulted in the former member’s injury. The acts of heroism and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01886

    Original file (BC 2014 01886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01886 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for injuries he received while deployed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00766

    Original file (BC 2014 00766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member's condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at that time. Following this reasoning one could conclude that assigning the rating as determined by the DVA based on evidence during the member’s active service would be proper, since it was based upon clinical assessments conducted before her actual date of discharge. c. All requested medical documentation should be supplied to the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02452-2

    Original file (BC-2006-02452-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02452 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his rank reflect staff sergeant (SSgt) rather than private. In reference to the PH, he believes he is...